Thought about my offset and backspacing...problem?
#1
Thought about my offset and backspacing...problem?
Here we go with an exhaustive read...
I want to run 17x9 wheels on the Ranger. I have them already, the wheels I was going to use on the Mustang. Anyhow, here is a calculated guess to as WHY they won't work.
The stock Ranger wheel is either a 15x7 or [I think] 16x7.
The stock offset is .472 inches positive offset, 12mm.
The wheels I have now, have 2.88 inches of offset, with a 6.12" backspace.
Here we go with my spheil.
That's alot of weight out toward the edge of the tire/wheel!
You can imagine a bar-bell used for bench-presses.
You have the weight [suspension components/GVW] in toward the center [less offset] and the bar [front rear suspension/driveline] is under little stress.
When you move the weight out toward the end of the bar, the bar will bend and bow [in theory] under the stress of the weight being out to the edge.
Does that make sense, to you engineering folk, or just plain old folk that might know?
This is an educated guess, but I am a "CT", and I tend to over think things.
I have been looking online at some new 17x8 wheels with the correct offset, and just thinking about having the correct 'numbers' make's me feel better, not to mention they'd fit easier.
Right?
I want to run 17x9 wheels on the Ranger. I have them already, the wheels I was going to use on the Mustang. Anyhow, here is a calculated guess to as WHY they won't work.
The stock Ranger wheel is either a 15x7 or [I think] 16x7.
The stock offset is .472 inches positive offset, 12mm.
The wheels I have now, have 2.88 inches of offset, with a 6.12" backspace.
Here we go with my spheil.
That's alot of weight out toward the edge of the tire/wheel!
You can imagine a bar-bell used for bench-presses.
You have the weight [suspension components/GVW] in toward the center [less offset] and the bar [front rear suspension/driveline] is under little stress.
When you move the weight out toward the end of the bar, the bar will bend and bow [in theory] under the stress of the weight being out to the edge.
Does that make sense, to you engineering folk, or just plain old folk that might know?
This is an educated guess, but I am a "CT", and I tend to over think things.
I have been looking online at some new 17x8 wheels with the correct offset, and just thinking about having the correct 'numbers' make's me feel better, not to mention they'd fit easier.
Right?
#3
For the most part, the original offset is chosen to work with the steering geometry and optimize wheel bearing loading. The aftermarket wheels that you own appear to have the more "modern" offset first seen on FWD but now common on many RWD, 4WD and AWD, too. The Ranger geometry and offset are definitely old school - that doesn't mean good or bad, just old school.
What you're saying is true: the wheel bearings would be loaded differently with the greater offset than with the factory offset. There is also the possibility of rubbing on the inside of the tire because you would be adding more backspacing.
Cosmetically, the center of the wheel would be pulled toward the center of the truck. This would be partially offset by the wider width. Still, the overall effect would be of the wheels/tires being pulled slightly into the wheel well.
I'd stay close to the factory offset, if possible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Side note:
There's something that doesn't quite add up in the offset/backspacing/width combination that you gave for the wheels you have now.
Backspacing on a 7" wheel with +12mm offset is ~4.5 (factory Ranger)
Backspacing on a 9" wheel with +12mm offset is ~5.5
Backspacing on a 9" wheel with +2.88" offset would be ~7.9".
Backspacing on a 9" wheel with -2.88" offset would be ~2.1".
What you're saying is true: the wheel bearings would be loaded differently with the greater offset than with the factory offset. There is also the possibility of rubbing on the inside of the tire because you would be adding more backspacing.
Cosmetically, the center of the wheel would be pulled toward the center of the truck. This would be partially offset by the wider width. Still, the overall effect would be of the wheels/tires being pulled slightly into the wheel well.
I'd stay close to the factory offset, if possible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Side note:
There's something that doesn't quite add up in the offset/backspacing/width combination that you gave for the wheels you have now.
Backspacing on a 7" wheel with +12mm offset is ~4.5 (factory Ranger)
Backspacing on a 9" wheel with +12mm offset is ~5.5
Backspacing on a 9" wheel with +2.88" offset would be ~7.9".
Backspacing on a 9" wheel with -2.88" offset would be ~2.1".
#4
Thanks Bob. I went by what the website said for the backspacing, and figured out the rest from there. If their 6.12" is incorrect, it'll throw off ALL the numbers.
I am considering 17x8 for the new wheel choice, but I do not want the typical Cobra wheels, but there doesn't seem to be much else out there that sparks my interest..ugh.
I am considering 17x8 for the new wheel choice, but I do not want the typical Cobra wheels, but there doesn't seem to be much else out there that sparks my interest..ugh.
#5
Originally Posted by Swoop1156
Thanks Bob. I went by what the website said for the backspacing, and figured out the rest from there. If their 6.12" is incorrect, it'll throw off ALL the numbers.
On a 17x9 wheel, the 9" number is the width inside the flanges where the tire mounts. The overall width of a 9" wheel is usually about 10", making the center at about 5".
The backspacing is the distance from the mounting surface to the innermost wheel lip. So, for a wheel with its center at 5" and an offset of 2.88", that gives a backspacing of about 7.88"
Working it the other way, from the given backspacing number of 6.12", you would have an offset of 6.12"-5"=1.12" or about 28mm. This is a more realistic number.
#7
Originally Posted by Swoop1156
Either way, I don't think I should run them, right?
#8
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
03Edge4.0
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
17
04-17-2006 07:38 AM