Narrow Tires
#26
#27
Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Topsham, VT
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Haha I jus said it cause you dogged on our dana 35s heh.
Aaron
Aaron
Nah, that 35 comment is more for Jeeps that have the 35 in the rear, guys destroy those all the time.
The Ranger weakness is the rear shafts (the "normal" 28 spline POS)...They will blow before the front...beleive me, I know all about that crap and I only had 32s at the time....
#28
Originally Posted by buckgnarly
Nah, that 35 comment is more for Jeeps that have the 35 in the rear, guys destroy those all the time.
The Ranger weakness is the rear shafts (the "normal" 28 spline POS)...They will blow before the front...beleive me, I know all about that crap and I only had 32s at the time....
The Ranger weakness is the rear shafts (the "normal" 28 spline POS)...They will blow before the front...beleive me, I know all about that crap and I only had 32s at the time....
#33
#34
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
nnooooo you bastard! Lock the 28 and watch it explode!!!
Anyways, I thought the 31 splines were stronger than the 9 inch. Either the casting was weaker or the 9 is 30? Eh, doesn't matter. They're both tough
Aaron
Anyways, I thought the 31 splines were stronger than the 9 inch. Either the casting was weaker or the 9 is 30? Eh, doesn't matter. They're both tough
Aaron
9 inch rear ends are usually 31 splines (BB ones do). the reason why they are better is because the size and contact pattern of the ring and pinion. and with the right casing they are convertable to 35 spline.
#36
#37
Originally Posted by SuperGildo@RRP
9 inch rear ends are usually 31 splines (BB ones do). the reason why they are better is because the size and contact pattern of the ring and pinion. and with the right casing they are convertable to 35 spline.
Personally I like the "Expedition Vehicle" look with the 32s-33s with 10.5-11.50 widths... but any bigger and the tire NEEDS to be wider.
#38
Originally Posted by rolla_guy72
Not quite so random....
Personally I like the "Expedition Vehicle" look with the 32s-33s with 10.5-11.50 widths... but any bigger and the tire NEEDS to be wider.
Personally I like the "Expedition Vehicle" look with the 32s-33s with 10.5-11.50 widths... but any bigger and the tire NEEDS to be wider.
#40
#41
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tom kalmanidis
OLD - Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
0
06-09-2009 08:47 AM
FMD
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
9
02-04-2007 10:36 AM