BF Goodrich AT/KO's Vs. General Grabber AT2's
#1
BF Goodrich AT/KO's Vs. General Grabber AT2's
Alright...I'm looking for a meaty tire that will get me from home, to work, to where ever I want to go (within reason...) I've had the AT/KO's on an other vehicle I owned, and NEVER got stuck or lost traction. BUT, the AT2's are cheaper...and have a better review on Tirerack.com. Plus a friend has them on his ranger and likes them. Also, I'm thinking about going from the stock 255/70R16's to the available 265/75SR16. What do you more-experienced peoples think about that?
#3
#6
My next dilemma is this: I want a bigger tire...even just a cople inches to make my truck a BIT taller. I don't have the money, nor the time to lift it properly...but I had an older ranger with larger-than-stock tires on it, and it looks decent, so I plan on doing the same to this one....BUT, what can I fit? Also, the BFGs range from 265/70sR16 to 265/75R16, but the General Grabbers are only available in the 265/70 size. I'm torn bewteen price, reliability, and size....gah!
#7
My opinion, go with the General, in a 265/70/16. If you want the front lifted, do a torsion bar crank. Now, I have the BFG AT on my ranger and I like them, but not enough to spend that kind of money to buy them again. Now, this is just an opinion, as I HAVE NOT ran the general tire.
Now, when I say I wouldnt pay that kind of money for the BFG again, is ONLY because the tire did not fit my intentions. It was a very very good all around tire but I was looking for something for more mud use, and light highway driving, not the other way around. Again, this is just an opinion
Now, when I say I wouldnt pay that kind of money for the BFG again, is ONLY because the tire did not fit my intentions. It was a very very good all around tire but I was looking for something for more mud use, and light highway driving, not the other way around. Again, this is just an opinion
#8
265/70sR16 (.27 lift in height) - BFG: $167 each / AT2: $100 each
265/75R16 (.79 lift in height) - BFG: $163 each / AT2: Unavailable through TireRack.com
I'd LIKE the maximum lift, plus I've been told by a tire guy in a local garage that I trust that 265/75 is the max I'd want to TRY to fit in a stock wheel well on an 06 ranger. But I don't like the price....
265/75R16 (.79 lift in height) - BFG: $163 each / AT2: Unavailable through TireRack.com
I'd LIKE the maximum lift, plus I've been told by a tire guy in a local garage that I trust that 265/75 is the max I'd want to TRY to fit in a stock wheel well on an 06 ranger. But I don't like the price....
#9
#11
#13
Well, I'd like a meaty tire. I live on a Private District road....which means the town doesn't like us, which means we fend for ourselves in the winter....which means that our road: Washes out in the spring, turns to dust and ruts in the summer, is covered in wet leaves and ruts in the fall, and is rarely plowed in the winter...and if it IS plowed, there's usually a sheet of ice under it. Soooo, I'd like to see something LIKE the BFG's or the Grabber AT's on my truck. I wrecked her once already because I lost my grip on the road, I'd rather not do it again.
#14
I have had a set of the Road Venture A/T's and they were a pretty good tire. I had them on a 1/2 ton chevy when I lived in Kansas and we had to deal with alot of snow, and black ice. The tire gripped well for what they were. But, I know what your saying, and being on the budget, I would stick with the Grabber A/T's and deal with the height difference.
#16
Originally Posted by TSabourin
265/70sR16 (.27 lift in height) - BFG: $167 each / AT2: $100 each
265/75R16 (.79 lift in height) - BFG: $163 each / AT2: Unavailable through TireRack.com
I'd LIKE the maximum lift, plus I've been told by a tire guy in a local garage that I trust that 265/75 is the max I'd want to TRY to fit in a stock wheel well on an 06 ranger. But I don't like the price....
265/75R16 (.79 lift in height) - BFG: $163 each / AT2: Unavailable through TireRack.com
I'd LIKE the maximum lift, plus I've been told by a tire guy in a local garage that I trust that 265/75 is the max I'd want to TRY to fit in a stock wheel well on an 06 ranger. But I don't like the price....
#17
I may be wrong, but I believe the front valance on an '06 is too close to put anything TOO large in there for a tire. The tire guy at that garage took some approx. measurements and figured on the 265/75's being safe....he may have been covering his own a**, though. I dunno, I'm kinda settling on the idea of slapping the Grabbers on there and going with the slight lift for the right price.
#18
Originally Posted by TSabourin
I may be wrong, but I believe the front valance on an '06 is too close to put anything TOO large in there for a tire. The tire guy at that garage took some approx. measurements and figured on the 265/75's being safe....he may have been covering his own a**, though. I dunno, I'm kinda settling on the idea of slapping the Grabbers on there and going with the slight lift for the right price.
#21
I have stock 16" rims. Again, I don't have the money to buy new rims AND tires. The BFG's consider the 16" rim a fullsize truck tire. There is no LT rating, and the tires are the heavier duty... Unfortunately, more rubber means more moolah. At least that's what I've been told/been running into lately.
#22
Go with the BFG's. The tread is designed to shed the snow. They are for sure the only tire that i'll ever own. Everyone I know has had sidewall issues with the General Tires. I'd say in the long run the BFG's are going to serve you best!!!
I got my 31x10.50x15 at Hibdon Tires Plus here in Oklahoma for 105 a peice after I made them price match Sams club..By the way they have great prices on tires.
I got my 31x10.50x15 at Hibdon Tires Plus here in Oklahoma for 105 a peice after I made them price match Sams club..By the way they have great prices on tires.
#24
If you're worried about traveling unplowed roads I suggest getting a narrow tire.Wide tires are made to give floatation on mud/soft ground.For snow that is the last thing you want.
Every winter I'm pulling out these idiots who come here from everywhere with lifted trucks pulling snowmobile trailers or have sleds in the bed,and the common thing with almost all of them is big ,wide tires.
I've been plowing here for twenty years where we get from 6 inches to 5 feet of snow at a rip.Skinny tire is the way to go.
Every winter I'm pulling out these idiots who come here from everywhere with lifted trucks pulling snowmobile trailers or have sleds in the bed,and the common thing with almost all of them is big ,wide tires.
I've been plowing here for twenty years where we get from 6 inches to 5 feet of snow at a rip.Skinny tire is the way to go.
#25
I've had both on my Ranger and in my opinion the Grabbers are far better then the BFG's. I take my truck down trails just about every weekend and I've never been stuck. Another thing is you'll get just as much life out of the grabbers as you will the bfg's. My dad has the grabbers on his truck and hes put about 60k miles on them and they probably could go for another 5-10k.