Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech General discussion of wheels and tires for the Ford Ranger.

backspacing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-24-2005
loneFX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
From: Summerville,SC
backspacing

with the backspacing on a rim, the smaller the number, the farther the rim sticks out?

how risky would it be using stock components with 2.75" backspacing and 33x12.50 or 35x12.50 tires?

ford is 5 on 4.5" wheel pattern correct?
 

Last edited by loneFX4; 05-24-2005 at 09:34 PM.
  #2  
Old 05-24-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
With all due respect, Chris -- I have answered this question at least 3 times in the past 6 months. Did you seach for the first question.

For the second part -- probably not any more risky them me running 35x12.5 on 3.25" backspacing really. And it will cause problems sooner than smaller tires. No one can tell you how soon. If you want to run big, you either build to suit (like my rear axle), or you put up with the maintenance overhead.
 
  #3  
Old 05-24-2005
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
  #4  
Old 05-24-2005
rangererv's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 1
From: Dearborn Michigan
Originally Posted by loneFX4
ford is 5 on 4.5" wheel pattern correct?
No, Ford Rangers are 5 on 4.5.

All Ford vehicles differ.
 
  #5  
Old 05-24-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
The 5 on 4.5 pattern matches Jeep Wranglers and Cherokees -- but the backspacing of those wheels is larger than ours, and the Jeep wheels are not hub-centric on our trucks.

Many aftermarket wheels are designed to be lug-centric and have larger center holes that fit everything.
 
  #6  
Old 05-24-2005
loneFX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
From: Summerville,SC
sorry i didnt think to search on this one.

i know different fords differ on wheel pattern. and i know that all things will wear if you run big. i was just wondering if i would expect to here crunch at the first curb i hit or sumthin.

ive decided not to go big. im goin with the 4" superlift and runnin 33s. i saw an older gen ranger with working 4x4 and it sat up pretty high but was runnin 31s and i liked that idea since the holes around here have hills at the beginning and end and/or ruts/trenches in the middle. this guy was clearing and i was hitting.

sorry again to have not thought before i spoke.
 
  #7  
Old 05-24-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
lol. I don't think so. You should see the whoops and what not I ran in Wharton during my testing. You may break something, but it's not going to get real "brittle" all of a sudden. It's still pretty strong.

No problem, Chris. I'm just a big ******* about reminding people to search!

33's are still "big" to my mind. I think you should just get 3.75" to 3.25" backspaced wheels though. I don't think you need any wider track than that for stability and you won't be stressing things so much. Also, those backspacings are more common.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raminman
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
33
03-23-2008 03:42 PM
TBarCYa
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
23
10-12-2005 03:53 PM
Swoop1156
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
7
08-20-2005 11:04 AM
brandons35
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
13
07-20-2005 10:32 PM
gatorblue92
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
8
05-13-2005 01:40 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 AM.