displacement ?
#2
#4
#5
i will get the link i found it on...i will let you read and interept it your way and see if we can come to a conclusion...its on the heads section...but it has alot about the pistons, heads, cranks, rods and alot of other things...
http://www.therangerstation.com/foru...thread.php?t=9
http://www.therangerstation.com/foru...thread.php?t=9
#8
"All 2.0/2.3/2.5 heads will physically bolt in place of each other, they all have similar
exhaust port shape and placement. All cams are interchangeable as long as they
are used with the proper followers. Later model ('95 and newer) roller cam
followers cannot be easily swapped onto an older head as the valve stem size was
reduced in the newer heads and matching slot in the follower was reduced.
Early 2.0 and 2.3 heads have the same small round intake ports spaced evenly apart, they
differ from each other in their valve sizes though
.
There are several variations on the 2.3 heads though they break down into 4 distinct types:
1. Passenger car oval port heads-’74-’80 Mustang, Pinto, Fairmont, Bobcat, etc.
2. Passenger car D-port head-’81-’95? T-bird, Mustang, Etc.
3. Truck round port- ’83-’85 Ranger
4. Truck D-port- ’89-’01 Ranger. The '89-'94's and '95-'01's have different combustion chambers and ports. IMHO, the newer head is better designed"
so basicly what i got from that is all 2.0, 2.3, and 2.5l heads are interchangeable and this should bolt on without any problems???
anyone want to prove me wrong????
exhaust port shape and placement. All cams are interchangeable as long as they
are used with the proper followers. Later model ('95 and newer) roller cam
followers cannot be easily swapped onto an older head as the valve stem size was
reduced in the newer heads and matching slot in the follower was reduced.
Early 2.0 and 2.3 heads have the same small round intake ports spaced evenly apart, they
differ from each other in their valve sizes though
.
There are several variations on the 2.3 heads though they break down into 4 distinct types:
1. Passenger car oval port heads-’74-’80 Mustang, Pinto, Fairmont, Bobcat, etc.
2. Passenger car D-port head-’81-’95? T-bird, Mustang, Etc.
3. Truck round port- ’83-’85 Ranger
4. Truck D-port- ’89-’01 Ranger. The '89-'94's and '95-'01's have different combustion chambers and ports. IMHO, the newer head is better designed"
so basicly what i got from that is all 2.0, 2.3, and 2.5l heads are interchangeable and this should bolt on without any problems???
anyone want to prove me wrong????
#12
#16
#17
would the cc chambers be smaller then the 2.3 head? if thats so it would lower compression and be better for turbo and not N/A..i have a 9.4.1 compression ratio and thats high but its a 4 banger and they are always higher. As for intake and that does that mean the 2.3 sensors will work...i would think so, dont think anything was swapped between the 2 rather then main compents...
And good info...what forum did that come from lol..
And good info...what forum did that come from lol..
#18
no im not sure if the cc would be smaller or im not sure if the sensors would work lol i imagine there all the same and i found this great little turbo ranger forum http://rangersrevenge.com/ check it out
still searching
still searching
Last edited by 94Ranger; 01-10-2008 at 07:17 PM.
#20