New Ideas Have a new idea for your Ford Ranger? General discussion of new ideas for the Ford Ranger.

Stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-08-2008
86_cookiemonster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Columbus Ohio
Stroker

Ok so this idea hit me the other day. There is that well know 4.3 liter stroker kit from tom morana. But if you have a 4.0 it doesn't make much sense to pay that kinda money for .3 litters more. The thought hit me, if you had a 2.9 v6 however, you gain more displacment and it could be worth the money.

So my question is, sense the 2.9 is basicly a destroked and bored 4.0. Would the stroker kit also work in the 2.9? Cause going from 2.9 to 4.3 is a pretty good increase in displacment. Note you would have to bore it out, but still.

Thoughts?
 
  #2  
Old 10-08-2008
Jimmeh's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,224
Likes: 1
From: Columbia Falls, MT
Originally Posted by 86_cookiemonster
Ok so this idea hit me the other day. There is that well know 4.3 liter stroker kit from tom morana. But if you have a 4.0 it doesn't make much sense to pay that kinda money for .3 litters more. The thought hit me, if you had a 2.9 v6 however, you gain more displacment and it could be worth the money.

So my question is, sense the 2.9 is basicly a destroked and bored 4.0. Would the stroker kit also work in the 2.9? Cause going from 2.9 to 4.3 is a pretty good increase in displacment. Note you would have to bore it out, but still.

Thoughts?
....I don't get it. How would a 2.9 being stroked to a 4.3 be better then a 4.0 being stroked to a 4.3, if they are basically the same engine?

It just doesn't make sense to me......
 
  #3  
Old 10-08-2008
86_cookiemonster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Columbus Ohio
well, if you have a 2.9, the kit is more worth while, stroking it out to 4.3. You get more displacement for your buck. you get 1.4 liters as opposed to .3.

Also I think that if you want to do a v6 swap, the 2.9 block is a lot cheaper than the 4.0, as the 2.9 is not as popular of a motor. So in therory, you can build a 4.3 cheaper by starting with the 2.9.
 

Last edited by 86_cookiemonster; 10-08-2008 at 07:59 PM.
  #4  
Old 10-17-2008
Sudden Impact Racing's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Latonia
the 2.9 is a different motor than the 4.0. if you want to go with more power and you are willing to change the engine. GO 5.0. the 302 and the 4.0 are the same as far as trany bolt ups motor mounts etc. plus the 302 conversion kit is cheaper than the stroker kit. if you find the right donor you can remove the entire harness and plug it in to the ranger. Just a thought.
 
  #5  
Old 10-17-2008
trucks423's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Sudden Impact Racing
the 2.9 is a different motor than the 4.0. if you want to go with more power and you are willing to change the engine. GO 5.0. the 302 and the 4.0 are the same as far as trany bolt ups motor mounts etc. plus the 302 conversion kit is cheaper than the stroker kit. if you find the right donor you can remove the entire harness and plug it in to the ranger. Just a thought.
a 4.0 and a 2.9 use pretty much the same block, IIRC. not the same bellhousing as a small block ford.
 
  #6  
Old 10-17-2008
Rooks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
So what your saying is that you would spend more money to get the same amount of displacement?

Even if it would work, (not saying one way or another because I don't know), you'd probably end up spending about the same on a J-Yard 2.9 or 4.0 since neither engine is a a high-demand engine. So lets say you go 2.9, then you have to pay for the Stroker kit as well as the machine work to get the block machined. Doesn't seem worth it at all.

Like Arin said, if you want power in our trucks, easiest way is a 5.0. It's been proven time and time again. Sure it's not original, but it's proven to work. You'll spend probably less money for a J-Yard 5.0 with some performance parts pushing probably 250HP, then you would for the Morana stroker kit alone.

Sure it'd be cool to have a stroked 4.0 (as it would be fairly original), but seems like a waste of cash to me.
 
  #7  
Old 10-17-2008
CBFranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay Area
The 4.0 is a bored and stroked ford vulcan? I find that hard to believe.

Or are you talking about the smaller version of the Cologne that is the 4.0?

If so, why would you swap motors to achieve the same results?
 
  #8  
Old 10-17-2008
Downey's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,470
Likes: 6
From: Muncy, PA
there is kit that strokes the 4.0 out to a 4.5 if you build a good motor you can make as much hp and tq as a 5.0 and then you can super charge it and make even more i would stroke out a 4.0 then super charge it then your weak points will be your tranny and rear end. but if you go the 5.0 way you can easly build a 5.o to make well over 300 hp with cams and pistons and head work the 302 is a well know motor and there are tons of parts out there and for pretty cheap. so its up to you but i would just stroke out the 4.0 then put cams in it and do some head work and call it good
 
  #9  
Old 10-17-2008
Rooks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by Downey
there is kit that strokes the 4.0 out to a 4.5 if you build a good motor you can make as much hp and tq as a 5.0 and then you can super charge it and make even more i would stroke out a 4.0 then super charge it then your weak points will be your tranny and rear end. but if you go the 5.0 way you can easly build a 5.o to make well over 300 hp with cams and pistons and head work the 302 is a well know motor and there are tons of parts out there and for pretty cheap. so its up to you but i would just stroke out the 4.0 then put cams in it and do some head work and call it good
But once again, for the price of that stroker kit, cams, head work, and a supercharger, you could build a 5.0 from the Ground up that would have 400+ HP and Torque.

**** is so expensive to the 4.0 motors, mainly because no one really makes anything for them.

I'd go with a 5.0 if I was going to do any engine work at all.
 
  #10  
Old 10-17-2008
sniper_101's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 2
From: Sask, Canada
A mild 302 will out perform a built 4.0 (or 4.3) unless it's a very efficient S/C or turbo setup.

Parts will beat cheaper, easier to find and have more details on installation. You can spend a few hundred+ on the kit, then misc. parts to make it work, then added work you forgot about (heads, intake, exhaust, injectors, MAFS, PCM and all needed accesories), plus a tune, you will need a strengthened transmission (auto or manual). Then after you spend the time finding a shop to touch a very un-commonly modded motor you'll still end up with what? Just over the power of a mild 4.0 SOHC and less than a power-added SOHC . . .

Or just listen to the people above trying to help you and do a 302 swap or 2.3T for alot less money, time, frustration and losses to other stock vehicles.

EDIT - Or if you really want to tear some holes, a 302 Boss block, 347 kit, alum. heads, carb setup and C4 . . . doesn't get much more HP/per $ than that.
 
  #11  
Old 10-30-2008
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 8
From: Ohio
Na na na... if you want to stick with a 4.0L here is what I'd suggest.

Focus on more rpms. This is a short stroke motor to begin with. Build on that characteristic. Have the crank weight reduced, cryo treated, and knife edge the weights. Have a set of forged rods, and forged pistons balanced to within 0.1grams. Then buy a high quality damper & have the rotating assembly balanced for 8000rpms.
Port the heads, get a matching cam, valves, springs, and put it all together with tri metal headgaskets and ARP studs.

Then you'll have a 4.0L that can push 300hp NA and live to do it again the next day. The TQ curve won't kill your otherwise stock drivetrain parts and it'll be more streetable power to use daily.

Rich
 
  #12  
Old 10-30-2008
Downey's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,470
Likes: 6
From: Muncy, PA
i think the hardest part is finding a 4wd 5 speed tranny that will bolt to the 1354
 
  #13  
Old 10-30-2008
SparkYZ's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Granada Hills, CA
Originally Posted by wydopnthrtl
Na na na... if you want to stick with a 4.0L here is what I'd suggest.

Focus on more rpms. This is a short stroke motor to begin with. Build on that characteristic. Have the crank weight reduced, cryo treated, and knife edge the weights. Have a set of forged rods, and forged pistons balanced to within 0.1grams. Then buy a high quality damper & have the rotating assembly balanced for 8000rpms.
Port the heads, get a matching cam, valves, springs, and put it all together with tri metal headgaskets and ARP studs.

Then you'll have a 4.0L that can push 300hp NA and live to do it again the next day. The TQ curve won't kill your otherwise stock drivetrain parts and it'll be more streetable power to use daily.

Rich

Are you talking the OHV or SOHC?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kingwoodranger
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
9
01-11-2010 11:51 PM
gt.teamnog
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
17
06-16-2009 11:18 AM
pacepace87
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
10
01-01-2009 03:16 PM
Blackhawk
New Ideas
28
11-16-2007 09:22 AM
INT3RC3PTOR
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
12
09-25-2006 09:12 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM.