you think my ranger can run 35x12.5 tires, also whats the stock gear ratio?
#1
you think my ranger can run 35x12.5 tires, also whats the stock gear ratio?
i drive a 93 4x4 ranger with a 4 inch suspension lift and a 2 inch body. i want to get some 35x12.5 inch tires and i was wondering if anyone has run 35x12.5 with a similar lift as mine without the tires rubbing when you turn or if you had any other problems? Also, i was wondering what the stock gear ratio was on my truck and also what type of axel it has? im wondering if i would have to re-gear my truck to run 35's. maybe someone knows a site where i can check that stuff out. that would be great.
#2
you can....but why? in my opinion 33s are big enough for our trucks...but a few guys have 35s on here...first start with basics...whats your engine size? auto or manual? as far as axle look on your drivers side door and look for the axle code then post it and we can tell you what you have...plus try searching drivetrain and wheels and tires...
#3
I'm not too sure about your clearance issues as I do not have too much experience with those older trucks, however you most deffinately would have to regear to run 35's. Your front axle is going to be a Dana 35 ttb and ratio on a 4wd is most likely a 3.73. That is going to be like a dog on 35's. I'm sure someone else will chime in that knows more than I do.
Edit: Someone beat me
Edit: Someone beat me
#5
4.10s are fine for 35s....yea.....a little bit of a pain. I drove a '02 w/ 5.5 RCD and 3" body and 35s w/ stock 4.10 ratio...yea....gear changes are long....but it's a pain.
I can only assume you have 3.73s as it a common older ratio...most newer ones are 4.10.....change them gears!
Your rear axle is either an 8.8 or 7.5.......usually 4.0s got the 8.8's.
lifted97ranger has 4" suspension and 3" body and 35s. i'm sure he'll chime in.
I can only assume you have 3.73s as it a common older ratio...most newer ones are 4.10.....change them gears!
Your rear axle is either an 8.8 or 7.5.......usually 4.0s got the 8.8's.
lifted97ranger has 4" suspension and 3" body and 35s. i'm sure he'll chime in.
#6
my truck is 6 cyl 4.0 liter and its a manual.
at this link: http://www.4wheelparts.com/gear_ratio.html
it says i can run 35's with a 3.73 gear ratio for a Daily Driver with Best Overall Performance. maybe someone can explain that chart to me so i can understand why i running 35's would be bad
at this link: http://www.4wheelparts.com/gear_ratio.html
it says i can run 35's with a 3.73 gear ratio for a Daily Driver with Best Overall Performance. maybe someone can explain that chart to me so i can understand why i running 35's would be bad
#7
loss all your take off mainly....be kinda sluggish...i have a 2.3 5 spd with 30s and i lost alot of take off and about 2 to 3 mpg...i need 4.10s...there are caluclators that will tell you what gears you would have with 35s and 3.73s but i thnink it will be like 3.27 or something like that...its jus going to kill your low end speed and put stress on everything
#8
Originally Posted by timpat92855
loss all your take off mainly....be kinda sluggish...i have a 2.3 5 spd with 30s and i lost alot of take off and about 2 to 3 mpg...i need 4.10s...there are caluclators that will tell you what gears you would have with 35s and 3.73s but i thnink it will be like 3.27 or something like that...its jus going to kill your low end speed and put stress on everything
4.56 or 4.88 is proper ratio for 35's. It is very close to a truck with stock 4.10s and 30's. But matt hates his 4.88s.......5.13s are avalible. That's low has hell too.
#15
#16
4.30s would only be for the rear i don't believe they have them for the 35 front however. i would say 4.56s would be good, 4.88s would be a good choice if you ever plan to go to 37's but then your would need to think about new axles any way. so 4.56s get my vote, look around im sure you can find some reasonable.
#17
I have a buddy who's got 35's on his 93 SAS'd Ranger with 4.56's. They end up being a good balance. He drives it as his DD as well as it being his trail truck. He's got the crawl ratio near perfect (Atlas II 6:1) and is still able to do 75-80 on the freeway at normal rpms.
Another buddy of mine is running 5:13's on his 94 on 36" Iroks (35" A/T's in the winter) and it's perfect as well. He doesn't have the low end grunt he had stock, but he's able to run 80+ at 3200 rpms.
Another buddy of mine is running 33's on his 95 with 4.56's and he tools along perfect.
IMO, go with 4.56's.
Another buddy of mine is running 5:13's on his 94 on 36" Iroks (35" A/T's in the winter) and it's perfect as well. He doesn't have the low end grunt he had stock, but he's able to run 80+ at 3200 rpms.
Another buddy of mine is running 33's on his 95 with 4.56's and he tools along perfect.
IMO, go with 4.56's.
#18
#19
Originally Posted by Fx4wannabe01
4.10s are fine for 35s....yea.....a little bit of a pain. I drove a '02 w/ 5.5 RCD and 3" body and 35s w/ stock 4.10 ratio...yea....gear changes are long....but it's a pain.
I can only assume you have 3.73s as it a common older ratio...most newer ones are 4.10.....change them gears!
Your rear axle is either an 8.8 or 7.5.......usually 4.0s got the 8.8's.
lifted97ranger has 4" suspension and 3" body and 35s. i'm sure he'll chime in.
I can only assume you have 3.73s as it a common older ratio...most newer ones are 4.10.....change them gears!
Your rear axle is either an 8.8 or 7.5.......usually 4.0s got the 8.8's.
lifted97ranger has 4" suspension and 3" body and 35s. i'm sure he'll chime in.
You have the 8.8 rear axle, all 4.0's (except for a few of the first 4.0's) have the 8.8 axle in the rear.....
If you are wanting to run 35's on your truck and unless you want some serious tranny issues, you must upgrade your gears to atleast 4.56.......I ran my truck for about a week with 3.73 gears (stock ratio) and it was bad....it would have lead to some serious problems......
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gts007
Drivetrain Tech
13
04-13-2010 11:53 AM
Bigdank
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
4
04-14-2008 12:07 AM