Need a price lift for a 2wd-4wd swap
#1
Need a price list for a 2wd-4wd swap
Okay I am debating doing this swap. So I would like to get a good idea on price to see if it's even worth it or if I should just wait and trade my truck in for a 4x4.
So if you could list out all that is needed and roughly what the parts cost so I can total it up.
Thanks,
Mike
So if you could list out all that is needed and roughly what the parts cost so I can total it up.
Thanks,
Mike
Last edited by Sonic04Edge; 06-28-2006 at 02:35 AM. Reason: correcting the title
#6
Originally Posted by zabeard
this has been touched before. not even worth your effort to make it a 4wd. unless you are doing a SFA.
it would cost so much and it woulnd be easy to do.
if you want 4wd trade it in.
it would cost so much and it woulnd be easy to do.
if you want 4wd trade it in.
#8
Originally Posted by SuperGildo@RRP
if you did the sas at the same time itde be worth it. but then why would you need to knwo all the stock parts you need? or am i misconceiving your question?
#10
Originally Posted by catfish hunter
even if you go SFA, its still gonna be cheaper in the long run to trade it in for a 4x4. theres just so much other BS that you have to deal with when doing the 4wd conversion.
also not to mention the money he loses on trade in. the only thing i can think of that would be beneficial is if the setup behind the tranny on a 4wd is completely different, which i would ASSUME 9 i dont know for sure) that you could just swith shafts to get a tcase on there...
#12
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
trade it for a 4x4....way cheaper
with what reasoning can you back that up with?! i honestly dont see any REAL justification to trade in just so you can get a transfer case especially when swapping in a manny Tcase is a good idea to begin with.
I just dont see the reasoning...
#13
because of the parts he would have to buy...he would have to buy a tranny, t-case, front 4x4 suspension, front diff, new computer, 2 driveshafts, and if he goes with an electric tcase, all new interior trim for the 4x4 switch...
unless he buys a totaled 4x4 ranger of the same year for about 1,000 dollars, that he could completely swap things, it would be cheaper..
unless he buys a totaled 4x4 ranger of the same year for about 1,000 dollars, that he could completely swap things, it would be cheaper..
#17
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
because of the parts he would have to buy...he would have to buy a tranny, t-case, front 4x4 suspension, front diff, new computer, 2 driveshafts, and if he goes with an electric tcase, all new interior trim for the 4x4 switch...
unless he buys a totaled 4x4 ranger of the same year for about 1,000 dollars, that he could completely swap things, it would be cheaper..
unless he buys a totaled 4x4 ranger of the same year for about 1,000 dollars, that he could completely swap things, it would be cheaper..
a manual tcase is a couple hundo, he needs new front axle, new suspension, at least one new driveshaft, and even IF he goes electric tcase he needs a new bezel and thats it. And itde be less work to tear down a 4x4 for SAS than a 4x2. Where the hell you get a new computer, i dont understand.
did you read the part about him not wanting to do a STOCK 4x4 conversion, but a Solid axle front conversion?
#18
#19
#20
Originally Posted by SuperGildo@RRP
im not positive on the tranny, but like i said thatde be the only holding factor but if you could get the tranny to work:
a manual tcase is a couple hundo, he needs new front axle, new suspension, at least one new driveshaft, and even IF he goes electric tcase he needs a new bezel and thats it. And itde be less work to tear down a 4x4 for SAS than a 4x2. Where the hell you get a new computer, i dont understand.
did you read the part about him not wanting to do a STOCK 4x4 conversion, but a Solid axle front conversion?
a manual tcase is a couple hundo, he needs new front axle, new suspension, at least one new driveshaft, and even IF he goes electric tcase he needs a new bezel and thats it. And itde be less work to tear down a 4x4 for SAS than a 4x2. Where the hell you get a new computer, i dont understand.
did you read the part about him not wanting to do a STOCK 4x4 conversion, but a Solid axle front conversion?
#21
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Advanced adapters has an adapter i believe/bet, but not worth it.
Also, you should really buy a 98 and do this. Then do a front end upgrade and blah blah. My p oint is you can pick up the truck older, make it look exterior new, and find a 4x4 for cheap.
Also, you should really buy a 98 and do this. Then do a front end upgrade and blah blah. My p oint is you can pick up the truck older, make it look exterior new, and find a 4x4 for cheap.
why would you want a 98 aaron? its the same dang front suspension.
97 or pre 98 would make some sense.
i say mod the one you have.
#22
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
a SAS ranger isn't proper for daily driving
you can make it proper with ease.
i bet you can still get 15mpg out of maybe even better if you have manual hubs. which you better if you went to all that trouble of swapping them.
if i didnt have to have my truck every day to get back and forth to work i would have a solid axle by now.
#23
Originally Posted by zabeard
why would you want a 98 aaron? its the same dang front suspension.
97 or pre 98 would make some sense.
i say mod the one you have.
97 or pre 98 would make some sense.
i say mod the one you have.
Well my thinking was.
01+ ranger, much higher cost
98 Ranger, same design, relatively close exterior appearance, upgradability.
So if he got a 01+ ranger, he's basically hacking off a good chunk of the cost of his vehicle. He surely isn't looking for the reliability of a new vehicle, since he's replacing the suspension.
And the reason as to not get 97 and back is simply it's a bit easier to upgrade the interior/exterior of a 98 than a 97. Not too much different, but diff none the less.
Also to lifted97ranger. A SAS ranger is actually about as safe as your truck on the road. SAS'd should have little risk of imploding the front axle, unlike your truck(although its unlikely to happen, its jus a much larger possibility). Also, as long as its a good job it is safe, and a flaw would be noticed in the first mile of driving.
Plus this is a ranger site! We don't want f-150s to offroad. They're fullsize trucks so they are wider/heavier.
Aaron
#24
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Well my thinking was.
01+ ranger, much higher cost
98 Ranger, same design, relatively close exterior appearance, upgradability.
So if he got a 01+ ranger, he's basically hacking off a good chunk of the cost of his vehicle. He surely isn't looking for the reliability of a new vehicle, since he's replacing the suspension.
And the reason as to not get 97 and back is simply it's a bit easier to upgrade the interior/exterior of a 98 than a 97. Not too much different, but diff none the less.
Aaron
01+ ranger, much higher cost
98 Ranger, same design, relatively close exterior appearance, upgradability.
So if he got a 01+ ranger, he's basically hacking off a good chunk of the cost of his vehicle. He surely isn't looking for the reliability of a new vehicle, since he's replacing the suspension.
And the reason as to not get 97 and back is simply it's a bit easier to upgrade the interior/exterior of a 98 than a 97. Not too much different, but diff none the less.
Aaron
yes but if you are going to 98, might as well get a 97, it will make things alot easier. plus its not like you need all the features of a 98+ or even 01+. if you are going to do a SFA, you really most wouldnt/shouldnt care about looks or interior features.
#25
Originally Posted by SuperGildo@RRP
I dont know about that. If hes going for a SAS at the same time he can spend the money on stuff that even i want to swap out sooner. manual tcase/ doubler comes to mind right away. all the really expensive **** for the ranger is in the front axle assemblies. I think it would be cheaper and much more beneficial just to convert the 2wd. think about this, pick up an axle, say d44 for 200, then rebuild, thats maybe a few more hundred. if you stuck with a mainly stock d44 assuming hes not gonna run anything over 35s right off hes still sitting pretty good relative to the ranger 4wd system. sure itll be more custom work, but its not like anything on the 4wd ranger will switch over to the SAS anyway. youll need a new steering box, tie rods, drag link, trac bar, coils and link setup/ leaf springs, hangers and shackles.
also not to mention the money he loses on trade in. the only thing i can think of that would be beneficial is if the setup behind the tranny on a 4wd is completely different, which i would ASSUME 9 i dont know for sure) that you could just swith shafts to get a tcase on there...
also not to mention the money he loses on trade in. the only thing i can think of that would be beneficial is if the setup behind the tranny on a 4wd is completely different, which i would ASSUME 9 i dont know for sure) that you could just swith shafts to get a tcase on there...