General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

3.0 4wd?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-16-2009
rizoss16's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: CT
3.0 4wd?

I thought all 3.0s were 2wd, but my bro found a ranger xlt thats a 3.0 but says its 4wd, i have the 4.0 and have never driven a 3.0. Its a 2003 xlt 4wd 5spd with 96k miles on it, for $5000. What do you think? I dont know about the 3.0, is it any different in mpg, power, speed, reliability, mods?
 
  #2  
Old 11-16-2009
rangerboy101's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,187
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, Va
The 3.0 with the 5-speed isn't TOO bad power wise.
 
  #3  
Old 11-16-2009
Jazz921's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
I liked my 3.0 but the difference between that and a 4.0 are like night and day. I would never go back to a 3.0 now after having the 4.0.
 
  #4  
Old 11-16-2009
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
there are alot of 3.0 4x4's mine is a 3.0 4x4 5-speed
 
  #5  
Old 11-16-2009
rizoss16's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: CT
is 100k alot for the 3.0? could he throw a quad in the back and not notice?
 
  #6  
Old 11-16-2009
rangerboy101's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,187
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, Va
Well Justin has 180XXX I think on his.
 
  #7  
Old 11-16-2009
wvcat's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 3
From: New Cumberland
I've had 5 or 6 3.0 4wd's The 5 speeds definatley run better. Not as powerful as a 4.0 with the same mileage.
 
  #8  
Old 11-16-2009
Jazz921's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
mine had 263K on it when it was totaled and never had any issues with it other than the cam sensor.
 
  #9  
Old 11-16-2009
wvcat's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 3
From: New Cumberland
Sounds like a pretty good price. The 3.0 I'm driving has 151k...
 
  #10  
Old 11-16-2009
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
The 3.0 is a great long lasting motor. Not super good on the power side but it'll get you around. Would I get one again, yes but if I could get the 4.0 for a little more I would do it.
 
  #11  
Old 11-16-2009
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
i have 183,600 on mine
 
  #12  
Old 11-16-2009
0RangerEdge2's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,592
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Idk about a 5 speed 3.0 having better performance. Although Justin has a ton of miles on his truck, I walk him frequently with my 3.0 4x4 auto.
 
  #13  
Old 11-16-2009
t5cents's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 1
From: Eureka, CA
i have 172,xxx on my 3.0....but it is SLOW!!! although i have 3.73 and 31's, and a 200lb toolbox (full of stuff), and a 100lb headache rack and steelies with super swampers (which are REALLY heavy).......it is super slow...even with the 5 speed.
 
  #14  
Old 11-16-2009
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
yes...it is slow...the auto has the advantage in this case because the rpm's stay up due to the ratios being closer and the torque converter slipping
 
  #15  
Old 11-16-2009
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 1
From: MN
I got a 3.0 4x4. Its not too bad with power. Of course I have stock size tires.
 
  #16  
Old 11-17-2009
SHOBout's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I have a 3.0 4x4 with the 5-speed. She does alright for what it is, I also have 31s on the stock 3.73 gears though. I'm saving for some 4.10s for that little extra help getting up to speed though haha.

Sean
 
  #17  
Old 11-17-2009
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 6
From: Beaver Falls, PA
i had a auto 3.0 4x4 on 31s and 3.73 gears and i hated it. Going up hills sucked it just didnt have enough power. I got horrible gas mileage only 12-13 around town and maybe 16 highway.
 
  #18  
Old 11-17-2009
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
theres something wrong there...i get 18-20 city/highway

was anything done to it? even maintenance wise?
 
  #19  
Old 11-17-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
I've never driven a 4.0, but I have a 3.0 Manual and a 2.3 Auto. Both trucks are about the same performance. I get 21 mpg in the 3.0 and 25 mpg in the 2.3.
 
  #20  
Old 11-17-2009
Machine090767's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
there is a reason people call them 3. SLOW
get a 4.0.
 
  #21  
Old 11-17-2009
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by Machine090767
there is a reason people call them 3. SLOW
get a 4.0.
People say FORD stands for found on road dead, do you believe that too?
 
  #22  
Old 11-17-2009
Sixt9coug's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 1
From: Norwalk, CA
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
People say FORD stands for found on road dead, do you believe that too?

Ive owned a 3.0 manual and 4.0 auto. The 4.0 is TONS better than the 3.0 in terms of power and smoothness. The Koln V6 is no luxury engine but it shakes and quivers at idle less than my 3.0 did. It also sounds better.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wvcat
General Ford Ranger Discussion
14
02-26-2023 05:26 PM
bleech1
General Technical & Electrical
11
11-14-2019 09:38 AM
01xltranger4x4
Drivetrain Tech
27
06-06-2007 08:13 PM
HarryTasker
Drivetrain Tech
10
01-19-2007 06:16 PM
Ranger1
General Ford Ranger Discussion
20
06-07-2005 04:49 PM



Quick Reply: 3.0 4wd?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 AM.