Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.
View Poll Results: 4.56s ? or 4.88s ?
4.56s ?
23
85.19%
4.88s ?
4
14.81%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

35s and what gears?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #26  
Old 11-02-2005
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
but at the same time wont it help out my acceleration which will allow the engine to work a lot less, and would help gas milage, or is this just something that i think would work but its not. lol
No, because increasing the tire diameter has the same effect as installing a numerically lower gear ratio. By upping the tire diameter and increasing the axle ratio by the about same multiplier, the overall relationship of engine RPM to vehicle speed remains about the same. That means that the torque applied at any given combination of road speed, gear, throttle position and engine RPM is about the same.

The whole point of changing the axle gear ratio is to make up for the torque loss caused by installing the larger diameter tires.

The issues of road friction, aerodynamic drag and tire mass are separate from the gear ratio calculation. No matter what you do, the larger/wider tires and lift create greater frictional losses that must be overcome by energy produced in the engine. Also, the additional mass of those big tires must be accelerated any time the road speed increases. For any given acceleration rate, the engine supplies more energy to the drive train to change the speed of the heavier tires.

And, of course, all of that energy comes from the chemical energy of the gasoline used.
 
  #27  
Old 11-02-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
ok, that helps... i wasnt thinking into it that hard i guess
 
  #28  
Old 11-13-2005
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Avon, IN
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have 35s and 4.56 i get between 15-19 all the time. all city is normally 16 and highway from indy to muncie to see the GF i get about 17-18 at 65-70 mph... im thinkin of goin 4.88s on mine as im gonna be buying some 37x12.50 truxus MTs when i can afford them.. so if i do that ill let ya know and you can get a sweet deal on a set of 4.56 front and rear... and yes i have all of the tools and knowledge to install them in a timely manner at the moment there is only about 9k on the gears.


remember im only bout 2 hrs south of you
 
  #29  
Old 11-14-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
sweet. ya let me know i may be interested!
 
  #30  
Old 11-14-2005
BlkTremor02's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Victor, NY
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Zach, I usually get 15-16 MPG with my 35s, 4.88, and S/C on my 3.0...It's the same when I had my 33s, 4.10 and Non-S/C..
 
  #31  
Old 11-14-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
sounds liek if i was to regear and run 35s my mpg wouldnt be that bad at all.
 
  #32  
Old 11-14-2005
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Avon, IN
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and i can still kick the crap outa them damn wanna be ricers around here





by wanna be i mean the guys that just toss a fart cannon on then do the "show" mods
 
  #33  
Old 11-15-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
did you run 4.56s with 33s?
 
  #34  
Old 11-15-2005
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
did you run 4.56s with 33s?
oh ya it would be about the same as when you where running 4.10's with your stock tires if you can remeber that far back LOL
 
  #35  
Old 11-15-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
oh ya it would be about the same as when you where running 4.10's with your stock tires if you can remeber that far back LOL


mmm sounds like fun.
 
  #36  
Old 11-15-2005
fletch12518's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Havre De Grace,Md
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im getting 4:56's with 35's. shouldnt be too bad
 
  #37  
Old 11-15-2005
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Avon, IN
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i did run the 4.56 with 33s.. it was noticable and i didnt really notice a drop off when i tossed the 35s on
 
  #38  
Old 11-15-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
mpg changes with the 33s and 4.56s?

i plan on 35s but i might not have them when i get gears.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
craigs2869
Drivetrain Tech
14
10-07-2011 02:32 AM
MugenCRX04
Drivetrain Tech
31
09-15-2009 10:40 PM
vansnxtweek
Drivetrain Tech
28
03-25-2008 10:11 PM
shadow905
Drivetrain Tech
35
03-29-2007 05:10 PM
HighRollerII
Drivetrain Tech
4
06-03-2004 09:05 AM



Quick Reply: 35s and what gears?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 AM.