4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

whats better to do get a e fan or get a program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-19-2010
Betts138's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Glendora, CA
whats better to do get a e fan or get a program

whats better to do for my next up grade a e fan or get a program? what are the gains on a efan on a 4.0 sohc and if any suggestions would be nice thanks
 
  #2  
Old 01-19-2010
randyl's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: sudbury ontario
do both... it only cost me 26 bucks with tax to do a e fan upgrade

just find a free fan off a p.o.s car . then buy the temp switch at the parts store there about $26 . and put it in. so far i did 2 and i have everything to do my 3rd one on my mazda. and every one i did it was only $26..
 
  #3  
Old 01-19-2010
My91Ranger's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 5
From: Roseville, Michigan
I vote efan. Its typcially cheaper than a programmer depending on what fan and controller you go with, but it free's up power by reducing parasitic load and can help increase your mileage as well.
 
  #4  
Old 01-20-2010
robert ray69's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: columbia,sc
Programmer hands down. I did the e-fan and felt no difference and no mpg change. Bought an xcal from bamachips and couldnt wipe the smile off my face.
 
  #5  
Old 01-20-2010
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 6
From: Muskegon, Michigan
i vote programmer. i have no personal experience with the e-fan but the power and mileage gains, as well as the ability to adjust for tire size, gear ratio, change shift points, spark advance speed/ rev limiter as well as the ability to read trouble codes is well worth the money spent for the programmer IMO.
 
  #6  
Old 01-20-2010
Stussy6's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
what does a good programmer go for?
 
  #7  
Old 01-20-2010
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
400ish

programmer hands down.
 
  #8  
Old 01-20-2010
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 6
From: Muskegon, Michigan
also, dont even consider a tuner for your ranger that isnt custom tuned, and as far as i know the SCT X-Cal is the only tuner avialable for the ranger with custom tunes, i may be wrong about that though. its been a few years so i dont remember what i payed for my X-Cal2 but i think it was around the $375-400 range but it was worth every penny.
 
  #9  
Old 01-20-2010
Lone_Ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Fernridge, BC
I've done e-fans a few of my trucks. I never noticed much of a gain (if any) in mpg nor power (that brick of a V6 will still feel like a brick), however, I have noticed one major negative effect: even with dual batteries and a 130a Explorer alternator and a 4 ga charging wire, it still doesn't like the fan. If you have anything else running with it (lights, stereo, ect) it will draw your system down. Of course, you only need to run your fan when stopped, so if you're always on the highway then its fine, but if you're stuck in stop-and-go traffic or crawling around offroad it sucks. Even with my previous 2 speed Taurus fan it still didn't pull anywhere near the same amount of air as a stock fan (and its a lot noisier). The only time I found that I liked it is cruising on the highway, you can get a little more top end power to pass (over 3000 rpm). I've only ever swapped mine to replace a worn out stock clutch fan, mostly because it was easier to do the e-fan swap and cheaper.. because I'm cheap and lazy.

I want to put a programmer on mine to try them out, just basic common sense would tell me that being able to set your engine parameters would do more than replacing a clutched fan that really doesn't draw a lot of power to begin with. LR
 
  #10  
Old 01-20-2010
ringer4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 544
Likes: 1
From: upstate ny
if don't plan on running higher than 87 octane- don't think programmer worth it...also had bad luck with a jet handheld wiping my computer's memory...am in same position am enquiring about efans and/ or headers myself
 
  #11  
Old 01-20-2010
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 6
From: Muskegon, Michigan
Originally Posted by ringer4x4
if don't plan on running higher than 87 octane- don't think programmer worth it...also had bad luck with a jet handheld wiping my computer's memory...am in same position am enquiring about efans and/ or headers myself
i disagree with that 100%, all i ever run is 87 in mine, i actually get the best mix of performance and mileage from the 87 tune. also, there is no comparison between the jet POS and an x-cal.
 
  #12  
Old 01-20-2010
ringer4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 544
Likes: 1
From: upstate ny
was told 11hp on a 4.0 ohv running 93 octane so on 87 can't see how worth it.. granted was considering it for the ability to be able to run flex fuel..also depends if stick or auto imo, in my case stick so has less benefits in my case- if mine was auto would most likely already own one
 

Last edited by ringer4x4; 01-20-2010 at 08:35 AM.
  #13  
Old 01-20-2010
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
Programmer. E-fans are notoriously unreliable.
You will get a much better response from a programmer with an automatic trans, but either way it is a good improvement.
 
  #14  
Old 01-22-2010
Betts138's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Glendora, CA
Originally Posted by Lone_Ranger
I've done e-fans a few of my trucks. I never noticed much of a gain (if any) in mpg nor power (that brick of a V6 will still feel like a brick), however, I have noticed one major negative effect: even with dual batteries and a 130a Explorer alternator and a 4 ga charging wire, it still doesn't like the fan. If you have anything else running with it (lights, stereo, ect) it will draw your system down. Of course, you only need to run your fan when stopped, so if you're always on the highway then its fine, but if you're stuck in stop-and-go traffic or crawling around offroad it sucks. Even with my previous 2 speed Taurus fan it still didn't pull anywhere near the same amount of air as a stock fan (and its a lot noisier). The only time I found that I liked it is cruising on the highway, you can get a little more top end power to pass (over 3000 rpm). I've only ever swapped mine to replace a worn out stock clutch fan, mostly because it was easier to do the e-fan swap and cheaper.. because I'm cheap and lazy.

I want to put a programmer on mine to try them out, just basic common sense would tell me that being able to set your engine parameters would do more than replacing a clutched fan that really doesn't draw a lot of power to begin with. LR
have you ever ran the Spal controller V3 on any thing it a PWM (Pulse-width modulation unit) which should be a lot better because its not just on or off if anyone has a comments on the Spal V3 i would love to hear them
 
  #15  
Old 01-22-2010
Lone_Ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Fernridge, BC
I've never run any controllers. I am a simple backwards hillbilly who avoids technology when I can Its even amazing that I tolerate my computer and fuel injected truck.. I'm lazy and hate carbs lol.

I want to try a controller on my '09 and see how it works. LR
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Trigger01
General Technical & Electrical
6
12-22-2007 08:55 AM
Mnemonic
General Ford Ranger Discussion
4
01-18-2005 07:10 AM



Quick Reply: whats better to do get a e fan or get a program



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 AM.