Ranger 4.0 vs Dakota 318 V8
#6
#7
#9
A few years in a row we Michigan Lightning Owners club had track days where we shared the day/event with the Dakota club.
The V8 versions in mostly stock trim run mid to low 15s. The bolt on guys could click off mid to high 14s.
So even my fairly well "bolt on" modified ranger would have a tough time out running a 2wd V8 version.
I **think** the V6 Dakotas ran high 15s if memory servs me right?
Rich
The V8 versions in mostly stock trim run mid to low 15s. The bolt on guys could click off mid to high 14s.
So even my fairly well "bolt on" modified ranger would have a tough time out running a 2wd V8 version.
I **think** the V6 Dakotas ran high 15s if memory servs me right?
Rich
#10
#18
#21
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
What about the 4.7 vs. the 4.0 modular?
My neighbor has a 98 Dakota, 4x4, 4.7 - he bought it used with no cats & a si/so flowmaster muffler, man does it sound nice. I'm pretty sure thats the only performance mod he has...
I wonder how good of a race it would be..
My neighbor has a 98 Dakota, 4x4, 4.7 - he bought it used with no cats & a si/so flowmaster muffler, man does it sound nice. I'm pretty sure thats the only performance mod he has...
I wonder how good of a race it would be..
do race and let us know :)
#22
Unregistered User
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Gearhead61
I don't think D's 4.0L is 4 liters anymore...
On topic though.. I never had any problems with many Dodge trucks. There was a yellow one with a bumble-bee in a black stripe around the back of it.. Didn't even need 3rd gear before he gave up. I'm not carrying any weight though ( no power options, 2wd.. ) as others are.
If I only had a regular cab..
#23
I was just asking cause I was reading a dakota forum or something where they said the ranger was quicker even with a trailer but I guess they were talking about the v6. atleast we're better at the off roading : ) http://www.offroadrangers.com/forum/...ad.php?t=21125