4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Ranger 4.0 vs Dakota 318 V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-25-2007
ReconRanger03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Los Alamos
Ranger 4.0 vs Dakota 318 V8

anybody raced one or knows who would win?
 
  #2  
Old 10-26-2007
jdm03edge's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Cleburne, Texas
dakota 318 v8
 
  #3  
Old 10-26-2007
bryce-man's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: beach cities,CA
yeah hands donw 318 v8 over the 4L v6 ...

heres yer sign!
 
  #4  
Old 10-26-2007
Matt3203's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: phenix city, alabama
what bout the 3.9 dakota
 
  #5  
Old 10-26-2007
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 11
From: Boring, Oregon
yea...I stomp my buddies 3.8 dakota. So yes....a 4.0 ranger beats a 3.8 or whatever dakota. 5.2, I don't know.

But, a 4.0 has NO CHANCE w/ a 5.9 R/T Dakota.
 
  #6  
Old 10-26-2007
Urandaman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: wher ever uncle sam wants
4.0 keeps up with 5.3 chevy single cab from a 45 roll its dead even til about 65-70 and then the chevy starts pullin haha.

the 318 is the 5.2 correct? id say it could be a close race til higher speeds when teh 4.0 starts to top out
 
  #7  
Old 10-26-2007
karrbass4life's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Last time I checked the ranger wasn't a performance truck at all. Use this rule.
V8 in a mini = pwnage
V6 in a mini = win, unless new toyota
v8 fulsized truck = idk i've seen losses and wins
Srt 10 = crack is bad
 
  #8  
Old 10-26-2007
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
My 3.0 can take my dads 3.9, I need to get someone else to drive the Dakota tho and actually race em. My truck feels a heck of a lot faster then the Dakota tho, i'll find out next weekend.
 
  #9  
Old 10-26-2007
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 8
From: Ohio
A few years in a row we Michigan Lightning Owners club had track days where we shared the day/event with the Dakota club.

The V8 versions in mostly stock trim run mid to low 15s. The bolt on guys could click off mid to high 14s.
So even my fairly well "bolt on" modified ranger would have a tough time out running a 2wd V8 version.
I **think** the V6 Dakotas ran high 15s if memory servs me right?

Rich
 
  #10  
Old 10-26-2007
Cody_288's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Oil City, PA, Pittsfield, PA
I raced a 99 single cab 3.9 5 speed dakota with dual exhaust when I had 31x10.50s and walked him like a dog from a dig.

My '03 Suzuki Z400 (quad) destroyed the same dakota from a dig but I got caught up with and passed when he got up to approximately 90mph.
 
  #12  
Old 10-26-2007
Cody_288's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Oil City, PA, Pittsfield, PA
Originally Posted by D.
I think its possible .
hahaha... Well yours is a little ridiculously fast...
 
  #14  
Old 10-26-2007
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 11
From: Boring, Oregon
come on D, your truck is not "normal". I'm thinking stock vs. stock. Of course it may be possible. der.
 
  #15  
Old 10-26-2007
mj550's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: USA
Oh those 5.2s and 5.9s arent that fast, heck a friend of mine has a r/t that runs 15s. Heck, the 4.7L one is a different story....
 
  #16  
Old 10-26-2007
Cody_288's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Oil City, PA, Pittsfield, PA
Originally Posted by D.
Not at all. 13-14second times arent ' fast '.. well.. to me its not fast... or ' fast enough ' :)
Well for a 4.0 Ranger, it is ridiculously fast.
 
  #17  
Old 10-27-2007
mj550's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Cody_288
Well for a 4.0 Ranger, it is ridiculously fast.
Yep I agree, heck 14s I believe is mustang gt territory.
 
  #18  
Old 10-27-2007
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
What about the 4.7 vs. the 4.0 modular?

My neighbor has a 98 Dakota, 4x4, 4.7 - he bought it used with no cats & a si/so flowmaster muffler, man does it sound nice. I'm pretty sure thats the only performance mod he has...

I wonder how good of a race it would be..
 
  #19  
Old 10-27-2007
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 2
From: College Station, TX
I don't think D's 4.0L is 4 liters anymore...
 
  #20  
Old 10-27-2007
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 11
From: Boring, Oregon
i don't think so either.
 
  #21  
Old 10-29-2007
Urandaman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: wher ever uncle sam wants
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
What about the 4.7 vs. the 4.0 modular?

My neighbor has a 98 Dakota, 4x4, 4.7 - he bought it used with no cats & a si/so flowmaster muffler, man does it sound nice. I'm pretty sure thats the only performance mod he has...

I wonder how good of a race it would be..

do race and let us know :)
 
  #23  
Old 10-29-2007
ReconRanger03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Los Alamos
I was just asking cause I was reading a dakota forum or something where they said the ranger was quicker even with a trailer but I guess they were talking about the v6. atleast we're better at the off roading : ) http://www.offroadrangers.com/forum/...ad.php?t=21125
 
  #24  
Old 10-29-2007
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by Urandaman
do race and let us know :)
He's too much of a baby..
 
  #25  
Old 11-02-2007
demonatng's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Selah,wa
With 4.10's and 31's I could out run my friends xcab 4x4 318 dakota with 32's up to about 60-65mph, after that it was point less. I did have a lot less miles on my rig then her too 10k vs 80k.
 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 AM.