2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Electronic supercharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-06-2011
-ETHEN-'s Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: CA
Electronic supercharger?

What's up everybody-

I'm trying to get the most power out of my 3.0 liter v6 and came across this...

Ford Ranger Electric Supercharger Kits Ford Ranger Superchargers

will this do anything or is it just a load of ****?
 
  #2  
Old 01-06-2011
stangdroptop351's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Scottdale,PA
junk they blow apart, know a guy that put 1 on a chevy camaro ss
 

Last edited by stangdroptop351; 01-06-2011 at 08:55 PM.
  #3  
Old 01-06-2011
Ford04Ranger4.0's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Plattsburgh, New York
wow really?
 
  #4  
Old 01-06-2011
03edge's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,038
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: OH
looks like a scam, but im no electronic supercharger expert
 
  #5  
Old 01-06-2011
ES894x4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Killafornia
i lol'd

ibtl
 
  #6  
Old 01-06-2011
Dangerranger01's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Boring/Corvallis, Oregon
BUY IT IT WERKS GREAT1!!1!!ONE!

i haz one and would never lewk back....
 
  #7  
Old 01-06-2011
StxDangerRanger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,315
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Dangerranger01
BUY IT IT WERKS GREAT1!!1!!ONE!

i haz one and would never lewk back....
Gimme 5.

Name:  newspaper.jpg
Views: 312
Size:  20.6 KB
 
  #8  
Old 01-06-2011
ranger4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: cambridge, ontario
i can not believe some of the questions that get asked here
 
  #9  
Old 01-06-2011
FordTough2007's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Auburn,ME/Selinsgrove,PA
Originally Posted by ranger4.0
i can not believe some of the questions that get asked here
x2
 
  #10  
Old 01-07-2011
darangerdanger's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: scappoose.oregon
buy $50 worth of premium it will work better lmao
 
  #11  
Old 01-07-2011
ranger024x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: nova
Originally Posted by ranger4.0
i can not believe some of the questions that get asked here
in theory, it could work.

but the size of the motor to make it work our stock electrical wouldnt be able to push it lol
 
  #12  
Old 01-07-2011
ME00Stepside's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
From: Maine
Wirelessly posted (Blackberry 8530)

 
  #13  
Old 01-07-2011
d0sitmatr's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: SFL
Originally Posted by ranger024x4
in theory, it could work.

but the size of the motor to make it work our stock electrical wouldnt be able to push it lol
your right, in theory it does accomplish the same thing as a mechanical SC. the downfall is as you mentioned, there is no way to get that to spin fast enough with enough force to actually work, and that is just touching on the bare basics of it.

some of you need to relax and quit being ****** to some of the newcomers. how many great things for our engines came from this very thing ? someone trying something new and finding out it doubled their HP ?
also, how would you feel if someone tried this thing and (against all physics) it actually worked ? I bet the guy who spent 10x that much on his mech SC wouldnt be so happy....

and remember this:

"there are no stoopid questions, only stoopid people...."
er.. or something like that
 
  #14  
Old 01-08-2011
BigEdge126's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Havertown,PA
Originally Posted by d0sitmatr
your right, in theory it does accomplish the same thing as a mechanical SC. the downfall is as you mentioned, there is no way to get that to spin fast enough with enough force to actually work, and that is just touching on the bare basics of it.

some of you need to relax and quit being ****** to some of the newcomers. how many great things for our engines came from this very thing ? someone trying something new and finding out it doubled their HP ?
also, how would you feel if someone tried this thing and (against all physics) it actually worked ? I bet the guy who spent 10x that much on his mech SC wouldnt be so happy....

and remember this:

"there are no stoopid questions, only stoopid people...."
er.. or something like that

Well said!
 
  #15  
Old 01-08-2011
Jrevans2002's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Chicago, Ill
Thats why we have this site, to share ideas, I hooked and old electric paint stripper heat gun, (2 speed for stripping with one cooling speed) on the cooling speed to my 80 Buick Century right to the snorkel with a few hoses and clamps. The car was in my garage and in park. The idle picked up and it ran smoother. So in theory it sounds correct, but the noise that might come from that 29,000 rpm motor spinning might not be worth it. Why wouldn't it be good to spin all the time? The need to get air into the cylinders is needed all the time. Even if its just 3 psi. it would be a plus.
 
  #16  
Old 01-08-2011
ME00Stepside's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
From: Maine
Wirelessly posted (Blackberry 8530)

There are, in fact, electric superchargers that work. However, they're more expensive than belt-driven ones, and draw so much juice that they can only be used in drag racing, where the engine is only running for short periods of time.

As for being nice, it's pretty much a given that you're going to get flamed on any car/truck forum is you ask about the $50 electric superchargers on ebay. It's pretty much common knowledge, and common sense, that all these $10-50 engine mods claiming HP gains are crap. Forgive those of us who find the humor in sarcastic responses to these things. LOL
 
  #17  
Old 01-08-2011
Jrevans2002's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Chicago, Ill
Yeah , my best guess would be thats the only reason they work at full throttle is the noise would be drowned out by the engine and the amount of time its on may be shorten when you get off the throttle. I don't know what speed that paint stripper spun at but it was loud and advised wearing ear protection when it was being used.
 
  #18  
Old 01-08-2011
Sixt9coug's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Norwalk, CA
Originally Posted by Jrevans2002@msn.com
Thats why we have this site, to share ideas, I hooked and old electric paint stripper heat gun, (2 speed for stripping with one cooling speed) on the cooling speed to my 80 Buick Century right to the snorkel with a few hoses and clamps. The car was in my garage and in park. The idle picked up and it ran smoother. So in theory it sounds correct, but the noise that might come from that 29,000 rpm motor spinning might not be worth it. Why wouldn't it be good to spin all the time? The need to get air into the cylinders is needed all the time. Even if its just 3 psi. it would be a plus.
The problem is that it won't achieve 3psi even at idle. at other conditions, especially WOT the supercharger will not also exponentially increase its own output as the engines requirements increase. At those higher RPMs the supercharger would actually be more of an obstruction in the air tract than an asset.

It's all BS.
 
  #19  
Old 01-08-2011
ME00Stepside's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
From: Maine
Wirelessly posted (Blackberry 8530)

Sixt9coug, well put.



Forgetting for a minute the electrical output needs, for any electric supercharger to be effective, its speed would have to be computer controlled based on engine load and RPM. Simply running steady power to it wouldn\'t work.
 

Last edited by ME00Stepside; 01-08-2011 at 02:44 PM.
  #20  
Old 01-08-2011
Ranger117's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: atlanta, ga
Originally Posted by d0sitmatr

some of you need to relax and quit being ****** to some of the newcomers. how many great things for our engines came from this very thing ? someone trying something new and finding out it doubled their HP ?
LOl, What? I must of missed the memo on that "stoopid new thing" that doubled the HP on "our" 3.0 engines...or any engine for that matter Sombrero!
 
  #21  
Old 01-08-2011
d0sitmatr's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: SFL
hence why I called you stoopid instead of its correct spelling, I knew you would instantly understand

flaming someone for simply asking a question is ridiculous and makes you look petty, sort of like the bully who is himself too arrogant to admit his true IQ level...
I mean, think about it, do you actually know the person who posted the question in this thread ?
no ?
so maybe he is only 15-16 and new to working on his vehicle ? is he still stupid then or is that how you actually learn something, by asking a question ?

I hope you think about that the next time you ask a question and someone laughs at you for being ignorant.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speed_racer_801
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
3
04-05-2007 07:36 AM
fordboyfx4
Drivetrain Tech
5
02-14-2007 06:16 PM
FMD
General Ford Ranger Discussion
8
11-17-2006 09:05 AM
Fiveologyjay
Drivetrain Tech
10
11-12-2006 05:48 AM
TippnOver
General Technical & Electrical
39
08-29-2005 05:35 PM



Quick Reply: Electronic supercharger?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 PM.