2005 Ford ranger 3.0 engine code problems
#26
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
#27
ABSLT TPS 19.2%
ENG SPEED 697rpm
MAF 0
COOLANT 183 degree
IAT -40
ST FTRM1 -5.5%
LT FTRM1 0%
ST FTRM2 -5.5%
LT FTRM2 0%
FUEL SYS CLSD
ST FTRM12 99.2%
also I changed one injector on cylinder 4 and clean the spark plug no carbon fouling. Let the engine warm up then took the MAF sensor off ran for another 10 mins and still had no fouling on it. Only on that cylinder.
Last edited by Sellers033; 09-10-2021 at 06:40 PM.
#28
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
#30
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
MAF is reading heavier air than actual air weight so computer is calculating longer open times for injectors, and then after O2 sensor feedback its having to shorten Open time by 25%, -23.5%
So exchange the MAF sensor
Without the MAF sensor data the computer uses a table to calculate injector open time based on RPMs and throttle position, for a 3 LITER engine, which is just math
The MAF sensor weighs the incoming air by how much it "cools" the heated wire inside the MAF, heavier air cools it down more
But MAF only samples 10-15% of the air flowing passed it, so error in the computers calculatrions is TIMES 10 when MAF is off a bit
So exchange the MAF sensor
Without the MAF sensor data the computer uses a table to calculate injector open time based on RPMs and throttle position, for a 3 LITER engine, which is just math
The MAF sensor weighs the incoming air by how much it "cools" the heated wire inside the MAF, heavier air cools it down more
But MAF only samples 10-15% of the air flowing passed it, so error in the computers calculatrions is TIMES 10 when MAF is off a bit
#31
#32
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Not making much sense
Rich i.e. "-" Fuel trims come from over reporting of air weight(MAF or Air Temp sensors) or Higher than expected Fuel pressure
Could be Computer has "lost the plot" as far as calculating air/fuel mix, but no way to test for that, outside of eliminating other causes and being left with "computer error"
But my problem with that is that it did show -5% fuel trims without MAF data
Rich i.e. "-" Fuel trims come from over reporting of air weight(MAF or Air Temp sensors) or Higher than expected Fuel pressure
Could be Computer has "lost the plot" as far as calculating air/fuel mix, but no way to test for that, outside of eliminating other causes and being left with "computer error"
But my problem with that is that it did show -5% fuel trims without MAF data
#34
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Yes, disconnected MAF sensor causes computer to use pre-set air/fuel mix tables, i.e. injector open times, since it doesn't have air weight data
Air "flow" is already known, a 3 LITER engine pulls in XXX volume of air at XXXX RPMs at XX throttle position, that's all just Math no unknown variables
Unknown variables are Air Weight(MAF sensor) and Air Temp(IAT sensor)
Air Weight changes alot, seal level up to 5,000ft elevation(Denver) sees a BIG change in the weight of the outside air, and the air pressure
"Hot air rises" why?, because is Lighter than cooler air, it's how a hot air balloon works
So outside air temp is also a factor, although not as big a factor as air weight from MAF because air temp tends to not vary much once its thru the air filter
All this matters because gasoline's air/fuel ratio is 14.7:1, 14.7parts air to one part gasoline, and this is a WEIGHT RATIO
14.7 pounds of air to 1 pound of gasoline
14.7 grams of air to 1 gram of gasoline
This is why Fuel injectors are rated in POUNDS of fuel flow per hour, not gallons or liters, POUNDS
So the air weight is the biggest unknown variable when calculating the air/fuel mix
Air "flow" is already known, a 3 LITER engine pulls in XXX volume of air at XXXX RPMs at XX throttle position, that's all just Math no unknown variables
Unknown variables are Air Weight(MAF sensor) and Air Temp(IAT sensor)
Air Weight changes alot, seal level up to 5,000ft elevation(Denver) sees a BIG change in the weight of the outside air, and the air pressure
"Hot air rises" why?, because is Lighter than cooler air, it's how a hot air balloon works
So outside air temp is also a factor, although not as big a factor as air weight from MAF because air temp tends to not vary much once its thru the air filter
All this matters because gasoline's air/fuel ratio is 14.7:1, 14.7parts air to one part gasoline, and this is a WEIGHT RATIO
14.7 pounds of air to 1 pound of gasoline
14.7 grams of air to 1 gram of gasoline
This is why Fuel injectors are rated in POUNDS of fuel flow per hour, not gallons or liters, POUNDS
So the air weight is the biggest unknown variable when calculating the air/fuel mix
#36
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
#37
#38
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Check the 8th digit of your VIN
VIN "U" for gas only
VIN "V" for Flex Fuel
As far as I know Rangers only had the 3.0l in Flex versions from 1998 to 2003
These are the stock injectors https://www.ebay.com/itm/OEM-FUEL-IN...-/274395465515
2001-08 Ford Ranger, Mazda B3000, 3.0 V-6 (U) code gas engine.
They are rated at 13.5lb/hr, 13.5 pounds and hour, which is generally known as 14lb/hr
If someone replaced them with, say 19lb/hr, then you would get Rich codes like you have now
VIN "U" for gas only
VIN "V" for Flex Fuel
As far as I know Rangers only had the 3.0l in Flex versions from 1998 to 2003
These are the stock injectors https://www.ebay.com/itm/OEM-FUEL-IN...-/274395465515
2001-08 Ford Ranger, Mazda B3000, 3.0 V-6 (U) code gas engine.
They are rated at 13.5lb/hr, 13.5 pounds and hour, which is generally known as 14lb/hr
If someone replaced them with, say 19lb/hr, then you would get Rich codes like you have now
#40
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post