General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

are headers a good bang for your buck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-29-2005
theclimax's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: long beach ca
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
are headers a good bang for your buck

i have heard from a few people they thought getting headers on a 4.0 sohc motor is kinda a wasted. They say it took away some torqe.
I am debating on getting some. I had 3 cats taken out and left the two with the o2 sensors on them. It runs through a 3 inch pipe to a flowmaster dumped. I also have done the air box mod. I really would like to get a bama chip but i am debating wethere to get the headers or not before i get the chip. I am running 35 with 456 gears and a posi. I dont want to lose to much torqe since i need it for the dirt. I feel if i let my truck breathe more then it is right now, i won't get enough back pressure just from that flowmaster. No back pressure equalls no good. What do you guys think
 
  #2  
Old 11-29-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
i would think that you lost more by removing the 3 cats. why would you do that and why would it help?

headers are gonna help more then removing the cats like you did. i havnt heard of anyone loosing power because of the JBA headers. they are a good product, its just they are not hte biggest bang for your buck like the Bamachips programmer.

if i had the money i would get them, and i prolly will get them. sooner or later.
 
  #3  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
his biggest mistake was running 3" pipe and a flowmaster...then dumping the three cats...

go to JBAs website and look at the dyno sheets. that'll tell u what u want.
 
  #4  
Old 11-29-2005
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
on a stock motor...not so much..
 
  #5  
Old 11-29-2005
vansnxtweek's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im sure they help, but i always thought that they are a little expensive.
and i agree, im thinkin you have lost a ton of back pressure
takin off the cats and the three inch pipe. that may have been a little much
 
  #6  
Old 11-29-2005
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow you had 5 cats? wtf? Buy JBAs and if u want a set lemme know!!!!!!!
 
  #7  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by vansnxtweek
im sure they help, but i always thought that they are a little expensive.
and i agree, im thinkin you have lost a ton of back pressure
takin off the cats and the three inch pipe. that may have been a little much
no no no...

backpressure = bad
removing restriction in exhaust = good
going to large in pipe diameter = bad

backpressure is not good, at all. its when u up the pipe diameter to much u loose the exhuast velocity. that is what causes low end power loss. modern day cats are a fraction of restricition as they once were so removing them is silly.
 
  #8  
Old 11-29-2005
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For modular engines backpressure is imortant!!!! BACKPRESSURE!!!! u need a somewhat restrictive exhaust, whether its two high flow cats and a magnaflow muffler or two stock cats and a borla. If you run it out in front of the tire(eliminated exhaust over axle) you will absolutely love the results!!!!
 
  #9  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
and why is that apply for modular engines and not pushrod engines?
 
  #10  
Old 11-29-2005
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well it does apply for pushrods as well, but the torque curve on mod motors is more up top and if u lose resriction down low, you have no torque until about 3500-4k rpms...

Look at it in this perspective... Motorcycles (Yamaha for example) have an exhaust valve called EXUP. It is closed until the rpms are in the middle of the power band to allow the backpressure to build torque. You cant have no backpressure at all and gain from it unless you live in a perfect performance world!!!
 
  #11  
Old 11-29-2005
Pinecone's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get the cats replaced, drop the pipe to 2.5" and then get the header's and you will be good.
 
  #12  
Old 11-29-2005
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly
 
  #13  
Old 11-29-2005
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by optikal illushun
no no no...

backpressure = bad
removing restriction in exhaust = good
going to large in pipe diameter = bad

backpressure is not good, at all. its when u up the pipe diameter to much u loose the exhuast velocity. that is what causes low end power loss. modern day cats are a fraction of restricition as they once were so removing them is silly.
 
  #14  
Old 11-29-2005
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why did i gain by not enlarging from stock, but coming out infront of the tire and losing two cats? how many of these comments are backed by realtime dyno charts?
 
  #15  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by NicksterSVT
why did i gain by not enlarging from stock, but coming out infront of the tire and losing two cats? how many of these comments are backed by realtime dyno charts?
uh, if i understand u correctly, u are saying what i already posted. stock or one size larger then stock size and no restriction = power gain.
 
  #16  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The ILL State
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on my mustang they recommended i got a bigger pipe from the 2 1/4's to 2 1/2's. Is that good or bad???
 
  #17  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
how is it gunna be ran? with an X-pipe?
 
  #18  
Old 11-29-2005
67cobain94's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vero Beach, Florida
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/exhaustScavenging.pdf#search='backpressure%20in%20 exhaust' Here you go.
 
  #19  
Old 11-29-2005
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by optikal illushun
uh, if i understand u correctly, u are saying what i already posted. stock or one size larger then stock size and no restriction = power gain.
I dont think you are reading my post right. What I am saying is that backpressure is a must for modular engines. I removed only two cats(meaning still two left) for better flow but still have backpressure. It is important!!!
 
  #20  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i think we agree to disagree. u cant get away without any restriction in an exhaust. there is always some present untill u run a straight piece of pipe off the header.

in the ideal world, the exhaust system would change diameter to meet engine rpm. smaller at low rpm and larger at high rpm.

im still unsure how backpressure would help a mod motor, unless the cam profiles are such that they need it. just like a header is supposed to help scavange the ehaust gas from the combustion chamber and equal out the exhaust tone pulses, a properly sized exhaust system does the same.

bottem line is:
-ack pressure isnt good.
there is always some form of backpressure in a legal exhaust system.
increasing pipe diameter more than one size over stock on a stock or mild engine yields torque loss down low, why? because the velocity and scavanging is throwin outta wack.

until u can prove to me how a modular engine needs some back pressure, i stand by my guns. not saying ur wrong or right...

back to the initial question, headers are definatly worth it. they are basically tuned pipes to allow the engine to efficently expell the exhaust gases by improving scavanging.
 
  #21  
Old 11-29-2005
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The ILL State
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im still debating whether i wanna run an xpipe or h pipe which is better?
 
  #22  
Old 11-29-2005
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea whatever, i ran true duals into a magnaflow true-x muffler. it has an x-pipe built in
 
  #23  
Old 11-29-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
idk some say its good some say its bad, i dont understand it, even after reading this post.

my truck 03 ranger with the 4.0, i had a SI/DO magnaflow, 2.5 in dual 2.25 out i lost alott of low end power(sure did seem like it). i changed from that to flowmaser but then to borla which is my current setup. SI/SO 2.25 and it runs great. good low end, mid and high, i have no complaints with it.

id maybe i didnt have my "ratio" right or something.
 
  #24  
Old 11-29-2005
Morph's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know on my old 4.0 OHV, when my muffler fell off (read, rusted away), I lost alot of getup and go. When I put a muffler back on it, it felt alot quicker.
 
  #25  
Old 11-29-2005
Monkey302's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about on a 3.0L is a single pipe 2.5 inch from the cat back decent? Still going to be running some type of muffler. I was looking at the JBA evolv stainless system.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dirtboardforlife
Suspension Tech
16
10-09-2022 03:05 PM
ringer4x4
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
18
07-09-2007 06:25 AM
a townn
Audio & Video Tech
20
05-01-2007 01:54 PM
Lord Of War
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
07-07-2006 09:22 AM
kimmer415
Drivetrain Tech
4
03-17-2006 07:20 AM



Quick Reply: are headers a good bang for your buck



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.